Search for: All records

Abstract Attention to a feature enhances the sensory representation of that feature. However, it is less clear whether attentional modulation is limited when needing to attend to multiple features. Here, we studied both the behavioral and neural correlates of the attentional limit by examining the effectiveness of attentional enhancement of one versus two color features. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while observers completed a color-coherence detection task in which they detected a weak coherence signal, an over-representation of a target color. Before stimulus onset, we presented either one or two valid color cues. We found that, on the one-cue trials compared with the two-cue trials, observers were faster and more accurate, indicating that observers could more effectively attend to a single color at a time. Similar behavioral deficits associated with attending to multiple colors were observed in a pre-EEG practice session with one-, two-, three-, and no-cue trials. Further, we were able to decode the target color using the EEG signals measured from the posterior electrodes. Notably, we found that decoding accuracy was greater on the one-cue than on two-cue trials, indicating a stronger color signal on one-cue trials likely due to stronger attentional enhancement. Lastly, we observed a positive correlation between the decoding effect and the behavioral effect comparing one-cue and two-cue trials, suggesting that the decoded neural signals are functionally associated with behavior. Overall, these results provide behavioral and neural evidence pointing to a strong limit in the attentional enhancement of multiple features and suggest that there is a cost in maintaining multiple attentional templates in an active state. 

Orientation sensitivity is a fundamental property of the visual system, but not all orientations are created equal. For instance, radially oriented stimuli, aligned with a line intersecting the center of gaze, produce greater activity throughout the visual cortex and are associated with greater perceptual sensitivity compared with other orientations. Here, we discuss a robust visual illusion that is likely related to this preference. Using a continuous response measure, participants ( N = 36 adults) indicated the gap position in a peripheral Landolt C placed in one of eight orientations and eight locations along four meridians (vertical, horizontal, 45°, 135°). The error distributions revealed that the perceived gap was attracted toward the radial axis. For instance, the gap in a regular C would often be wrongly perceived as tilted 45° corresponding to the oblique meridian where it was placed. These findings demonstrate an unsuspected early-vision influence on the perceived orientation of an object.